GEL UNDER MICROSCOPE

GEL UNDER MICROSCOPE

Transparent gel that was sent in and discussed in a previous Carnicom paper named GEL FALLOUT REPORTS, dated April 24, 2000, is pictured and analyzed in this paper. There are three (3) recurring forms or objects that appear in each of three (3) separate slides that were prepared for viewing under a microscope: 1) an unidentified circular cell around 45 microns in diameter; 2) pine pollen, which is identical to the pine pollen found in the previous paper titled INQUIRY: RAINWATER ANALYSIS dated June 27, 2000; and 3) geometrically ribbed linear forms. Numerous pictures are attached to this paper for viewing.
SAMPLES REQUIRE IDENTIFICATION

SAMPLES REQUIRE IDENTIFICATION

Three separate samples that were collected in August 2000 are pictured and discussed in this paper. The first sample analyzed was sent in from Missouri and is a dark brown/black powdery substance, and is possibly a fungus. A microscope shows the substance to be made up of uniform spherical structures about 7 microns in diameter. The second substance discussed is a fibrous material that was found in a previous rainwater sample collected on June 26-27, 2000 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. When dried, these fibers appeared dendritic in nature, and under a microscope, they measured roughly 1 micron in diameter. The third substance is a material that appeared to have originated from the ground in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and is not believed to be related with aerial activity. This material, described as having a foam-like nature and a texture like ‘chocolate mousse’, is believed to be fungus related, though such a growth is not known to thrive in desert conditions in New Mexico. Input is welcome in determining what these substances are. Those with mycology or microbiology backgrounds are encouraged to respond to the Carnicom Institute.
ADDITIONAL BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

ADDITIONAL BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

Microscopy stills are attached in this paper from fiber samples that had been previously evaluated in an earlier Carnicom paper named BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED that was published on May 11, 2000. Though a portion of this same fiber sample was sent to EPA Administrator Carol M. Browner six months prior to this paper, to date, Ms. Browner refuses to identify the material in this sample.
EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

EPA REFUSES TO IDENTIFY SAMPLE

A letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Clifford Carnicom states the intention of the EPA is to not analyze the samples sent to them by Mr. Carnicom previously. Rather, they attached their same letter of refusal from earlier in the year that describes their view that aerosols and such programs do not exist, and that it is normal contrails that are showing in the skies that people are reporting.
SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS

SOUTH AFRICA FIBERS; NEWS REPORT CORROBORATES U.S. FINDINGS

A letter to the Rapport Newspaper in South Africa, Cape Edition on June 25, 2000 is the subject of this page. Sticky fibers were found falling from the sky and formed a blanket like appearance across fields, telephone poles, and barbed wire. Reports came in that cattle and lambs in the area had fallen ill after eating the ‘cotton-like fibers’, and farmers and town inhabitants believe the fiber origins are from airplanes seen in the area. These fibers sound identical to those found in the US and documented, tested and analyzed by the Carnicom Institute.
EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

EPA DEEMED NEGLIGENT

A copy of a certified letter sent by Clifford Carnicom on June 9, 2000 to Carol M. Browner, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is attached in this paper that outlines how Ms. Browner has been negligent in not investigating and analyzing hazardous biological samples sent previously to the EPA that pose human health risks. This letter makes clear that Ms. Browner and the EPA are responsible for reporting to the American public, and having not been forthcoming with an interest to look into the requests for sample analysis, Ms. Browner and the EPA are to be held accountable for the lack of integrity of the EPA.
BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED

Further testing of ground fiber samples previously collected and analyzed (see papers titled AEROSOL GROUND SAMPLES) revealed biological components in the fibers - numerous red blood cells, white blood cells, and unidentified cell types have been found in the ground samples. The red blood cells, readily visible after being subjected to immersion oil, appear to possibly be of a freeze dried or desiccated nature. Numerous pictures from the microscope video show these biological as well as unidentified components. The surfaces of the cells appear to be modified in some way, but electron microscopy will likely be required to establish further detail.
GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

GEL FALLOUT REPORTS

A honey like substance was splattered on a witness’ windshield while she was driving in California in April 2000, as well as on the car’s windshield behind her. The woman took photographs that are shown in this paper, and a small sample of this material was sent to Clifford Carnicom for analysis. There is fibrous material in the sample as well. This occurred under a clear sky with no obvious reason for this material to have landed on this car. Of note are two similar instances of what appeared to be identical materials observed, one in July 2000 in Albuquerque New Mexico that was experienced by Clifford Carnicom, where a material landed on his car windshield that was similar form and color to that of the samples sent to him previously. Another report from a witness in North Carolina claimed in August 2000 that a very similar material was found on her car windshield.
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT INVESTIGATIONS

A ground fiber sample received previously in November 1999 is observed and pictured in this paper under a microscope and black light, and is compared to other known and unknown synthetic fibers. A notable thing from this observation is that the ground fibers show a low level of fluorescence, whereas the synthetics compared to show a high level of fluorescence. The ground fiber samples also showed sub-micron diameter, and high levels of adhesiveness and elasticity. Additional data and feedback of the current investigations underway with UV light is most welcome.