O’CONNELL OPPOSES SPRAYING

O’CONNELL OPPOSES SPRAYING

This paper is an actual letter that was sent from California State Senator Hack O’Connell in response to a letter sent to him regarding the concern of aerosol spraying programs. His initial response seems to be that of concern, but he eventually directs the sender to NASA’s website and makes it clear that his belief is that these aerosol trails are indeed normal ‘contrails’.
20 TIMES

20 TIMES

This paper outlines the 20 fold increase in the concentration of hydroxide ion concentration in the atmosphere of the United States. Recent and preliminary pH test data from across the nation indicates that this increase has happened when comparing baseline data from 1990-1999 data with that of 1999. This significant change in a relatively short time frame has major implications for both the chemistry and biology of the nation and the planet at large.
PROJECT REPORT NO. 1

PROJECT REPORT NO. 1

This paper is an outline of an investigative study group (composed of researchers with backgrounds in disciplines such as electronics, communications, medicine and others) formed to give an understanding of aerosol programs and other related scientific, government, and military programs going on in the United States. This report covers aspects of aerosol programs, including but not limited to weather modification, experiments, scalar weapons, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP), ongoing research and development by the government and military, and others. This report was devised in order to get people to focus on the critical and dangerous nature of these programs, and was added to the Carnicom website.
OFFICIAL RESPONSES TO AEROSOL OPERATION INQUIRIES

OFFICIAL RESPONSES TO AEROSOL OPERATION INQUIRIES

Numerous response letters and other documents are provided in this paper that have been received from government and military agencies in response to inquiries sent to them regarding growing alarm over aerosol programs. These replies vary in their misinformation, contain lies, fabrications and denials of such programs, and have been sent from entities such as the Air Force, Secretary of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Greenpeace, Attorney Generals, and more.
CONTRAIL PHYSICS

CONTRAIL PHYSICS

This paper discusses a preliminary model developed in order to estimate the length of time required for ‘normal’ contrails to dissipate. The model developed agrees extremely well with historical behavior and observation of contrails. Conclusions that result from the study of this model include the expected rate of water vapor based contrails, and that the rates of dissipation for normal contrails are based on the size of ice crystal particulates and amount of solar radiation. A further conclusion drawn is that if an observed contrail does not conform to the model, it is likely that the material of emission is not water vapor.
EIGHT CONDITIONS

EIGHT CONDITIONS

Further exploring the need for increased testing of rainwater for pH is the subject of this paper. Eight conditions for identifying components of aerosol particulates are presented as hypotheses that if proven true will help identify these particulates being salts and trace metals such as barium and strontium.
AIR FORCE LIES TO AMERICA

AIR FORCE LIES TO AMERICA

This article is a copy of a letter from Michael K. Gibson, Lt. Col., United States Air Force in response to to US Rep. Mark Green’s inquiry into aerosols, a.k.a. ‘chemtrails’. The letter states makes incorrect statements regarding the existence of aerosol programs, as well as stating that the lines seen emanating from aircraft are normal ‘contrails’.
pH TEST ALERT

pH TEST ALERT

This paper makes the case for increased testing of pH levels in in rainwater by US citizens. At this point, there are indications that significant alterations in atmospheric chemistry have occurred due to aerosol operations. A pH test from Santa Fe, New Mexico yielded a fairly significant deviation from what was expected and is presented as an additional reason for rainwater testing.
A CASE FOR TESTING

A CASE FOR TESTING

A logical case has been developed within this article to substantiate the need for environmental testing of barium or barium compounds in our water, air and soil based on the progression of the following: 1)Meteorological studies of aerosol particulates being introduced into the atmosphere 2)Information from a highly credible source 3)Chemistry analysis of barium and barium compounds 4)pH testing of rainwater for alkalinity/acidity 5)Collection of physical samples after aerosol spraying 6)Testing of collected samples against a hypothesis that these samples are barium based 7)Solubility and equilibrium considerations of barium and barium compounds 8)Environmental testing (water, soil, air)